Editorial Standards

Last Updated: February 7, 2026

Our Commitment to Quality

At Natural Perimenopause, operated by Neonframe, Inc., we are committed to providing accurate, evidence-based, and trustworthy information about perimenopause and natural health solutions. These editorial standards guide everything we publish.

Evidence-Based Content

All health claims and recommendations on our website are supported by scientific evidence. We prioritize:

  • Peer-reviewed scientific studies
  • Clinical trials and research
  • Guidelines from reputable medical organizations
  • Expert consensus from healthcare professionals

Expert Review

Our content is reviewed by qualified experts with relevant credentials and experience in women's health, menopause, nutrition, and related fields. We work with:

  • Licensed healthcare professionals
  • Registered dietitians and nutritionists
  • Certified menopause practitioners
  • Subject matter experts in relevant fields

Transparency

We believe in full transparency about:

  • Affiliate relationships: We clearly disclose when content contains affiliate links
  • Sources: We cite our sources and link to original research when possible
  • Limitations: We acknowledge when evidence is limited or conflicting
  • Updates: We regularly review and update content to reflect new research

Editorial Independence

Our editorial content is independent of our business relationships. Product recommendations are based on quality, evidence, and value—not on commission rates or advertising relationships.

Accuracy and Corrections

We strive for accuracy in all our content. When errors are identified:

  • We correct them promptly
  • We note significant corrections in the article
  • We update the "Last Updated" date

Content Review Process

Before publication, all content goes through:

  1. Research: Thorough research using credible sources
  2. Writing: Clear, accessible writing that explains complex topics
  3. Fact-checking: Verification of all claims and statistics
  4. Expert review: Review by qualified healthcare professionals
  5. Editorial review: Final review for clarity, accuracy, and completeness

Sources We Trust

We prioritize information from:

  • Peer-reviewed medical journals
  • Government health agencies (NIH, CDC, FDA)
  • Professional medical organizations (NAMS, ACOG, etc.)
  • Academic medical institutions
  • Reputable health organizations

Product Recommendations

When recommending products, we consider:

  • Scientific evidence supporting the ingredients
  • Quality of manufacturing and third-party testing
  • Transparency of ingredient sourcing
  • Value for money
  • User reviews and feedback

Feedback and Corrections

We welcome feedback from our readers. If you believe any of our content contains errors or could be improved, please contact us at [email protected].

Contact Us

For questions about our editorial standards, please contact:

Neonframe, Inc.
123 Lincoln Place
Brooklyn, NY 11217
Email: [email protected]